Completed
Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
Jirka MaršíkJirka MaršíkLabels
Approval
OkPatch
Code and TestPriority
TrivialAffects versions
Fix versions
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Jirka Maršík
Jirka MaršíkLabels
Approval
Ok
Patch
Code and Test
Priority
Affects versions
Fix versions
Created March 16, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Updated October 25, 2013 at 5:01 PM
Resolved October 25, 2013 at 5:01 PM
Problem: Evaluating a persistent collection for which the function
first
returns the symboldo
leads to that collection being treated as the do special form, even though it may be a vector or even a set. IMHO, the expected result would be to report thatdo
cannot be resolved.Cause: The check for
do
is checking for IPersistentCollection instead of ISeq.Solution: Change the cast (occurs in two places) for the
do
form check from IPersistentCollection to ISeq:to
Current patch: CLJ-1184-p4.patch
Screened by: Alex Miller