Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Patch:Code and Test
I like to try and keep my level of nesting under control, and this
often involves hiding or re-structuring the let macro. The for macro
can implicitly assemble a let macro for you, but with a limitation
that the :let clause can't be first:
Is this limitation intentional? Could the error message be improved?
Here's what I wanted to write:
(the formatting is probably scrambled)
But I had to juggle it to this:
Of course there are any number of ways to write this, but I prefer the
first option, as it does less of a job of obscuring what the main
point of the function is: a call to extend-dom.