Details
-
Type:
Defect
-
Status:
Open
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Release 1.2, Release 1.3
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:All
Description
There seems to be some inconsistencies when implementing protocols that have multi arity functions depending on how the protocol is implemented. I have attached a clj file illustrating this. The short version is that multi arity must be defined as such w/ defrecord:
(defrecord Zomg []
SomeProto
(hello [_] 1)
(hello [_ _] 1))
And as such with extend-type
(extend-type Object
SomeProto
(hello
([_] 1)
([_ _] 1)))
I have only tested defrecord & extend-type. I am unsure how it works with deftype and extend-protocol.
