[#LOGIC-102] generalize the notion of hash for robustness - Clojure JIRA

Details

Type: Defect
Status: Resolved
Priority: Major
Resolution: Completed
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Component/s: None
Labels:
None

Description

The second nom/hash throws an exception, because the nom/hash constraint is ran before the predc one.

(is (= (run* [q]
         (nom/fresh [x]
           (fresh [y]
             (predc y nom? `nom?)
             (nom/hash y x)
             (== y 'foo))))
      ()))

(is (= (run* [q]
         (nom/fresh [x]
           (fresh [y]
             (nom/hash y x)
             (predc y nom? `nom?)
             (== y 'foo))))
      ()))

Perhaps, we can generalize the notion of hash.

More Options
- Sort By Name
- Sort By Date
- Ascending
- Descending
- Download All

Attachments

logic-102.diff

07/Jan/13 12:39 PM

5 kB

Nada Amin
refactoring.diff

08/Jan/13 7:04 AM

2 kB

Nada Amin

Activity

Descending order - Click to sort in ascending order

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 11/Mar/13 12:30 PM

Applied in https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/commit/43d325bd8e3770f3483cc8be7d332adfae3a6a96

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 11/Mar/13 12:30 PM Applied in https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/commit/43d325bd8e3770f3483cc8be7d332adfae3a6a96

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 11/Mar/13 12:27 PM

I am going to apply the refactoring to master.

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 11/Mar/13 12:27 PM I am going to apply the refactoring to master.

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 08/Jan/13 7:12 AM

Makes sense will apply later today.

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 08/Jan/13 7:12 AM Makes sense will apply later today.

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 08/Jan/13 7:04 AM

refactoring.diff refactors the logic a bit. Hopefully it's more readable.

For now, it seems too much trouble for the gain to generalize hash or try to write it using more primitive constraints.

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 08/Jan/13 7:04 AM refactoring.diff refactors the logic a bit. Hopefully it's more readable. For now, it seems too much trouble for the gain to generalize hash or try to write it using more primitive constraints.

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 7:06 PM

fixed, http://github.com/clojure/core.logic/commit/417246ad0d854f9f82ae3b5aeb566ea00249eb2c

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 7:06 PM fixed, http://github.com/clojure/core.logic/commit/417246ad0d854f9f82ae3b5aeb566ea00249eb2c

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 2:38 PM

OK, as discussed, please go ahead with the patch, and I'll think of some alternatives / refactoring soon.

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 2:38 PM OK, as discussed, please go ahead with the patch, and I'll think of some alternatives / refactoring soon.

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 1:52 PM

Also if you're OK w/ this patch, more than happy to move forward w/ this for now and it can be improved later.

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 1:52 PM Also if you're OK w/ this patch, more than happy to move forward w/ this for now and it can be improved later.

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 1:23 PM

Is there something we could do to make it easier to rely on `fixc` and `predc`? Or is there some lacking feature of constraints?

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 1:23 PM Is there something we could do to make it easier to rely on `fixc` and `predc`? Or is there some lacking feature of constraints?

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 12:39 PM

The patch logic-102.diff gives up on predc and fixc, and instead does a lot of ugly special-casing to cover the new TDD test cases.

Not too happy about this change...

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 12:39 PM The patch logic-102.diff gives up on predc and fixc, and instead does a lot of ugly special-casing to cover the new TDD test cases. Not too happy about this change...

Hide

Permalink

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 11:11 AM

ok, seems reasonable to fail.

The fix to logic-101 is not entirely satisfactory, because we can now get constraints like _1#[_1]. so i think i also want to not use predc (but still use fixc), but have a custom constraint instead of the predc that takes the two rands into account.

implementing this now.

Show

Nada Amin added a comment - 07/Jan/13 11:11 AM ok, seems reasonable to fail. The fix to logic-101 is not entirely satisfactory, because we can now get constraints like _1#[_1]. so i think i also want to not use predc (but still use fixc), but have a custom constraint instead of the predc that takes the two rands into account. implementing this now.

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 10:59 AM

Closed wrong ticket

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 10:59 AM Closed wrong ticket

Hide

Permalink

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 10:52 AM

Hmm but why throw in nom/hash like that instead of just failing?

Show

David Nolen added a comment - 07/Jan/13 10:52 AM Hmm but why throw in nom/hash like that instead of just failing?

People

Assignee:

David Nolen

Reporter:

Nada Amin

Vote (0)

Watch (1)

Dates

Created:

07/Jan/13 9:47 AM

Updated:

11/Mar/13 12:30 PM

Resolved:

07/Jan/13 7:06 PM