Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Completed
-
Affects Version/s: 0.2.0-beta9, 0.2.0-beta10
-
Fix Version/s: 0.2.0-beta10
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
Description
Activity
Chas Emerick
made changes -
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Fix Version/s | 0.2.0 [ 10052 ] | |
| Fix Version/s | 0.2.0-beta10 [ 10153 ] |
Chas Emerick
made changes -
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Chas Emerick
made changes -
| Resolution | Completed [ 1 ] | |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
If it helps, I did observe in some testing that after the server side of the socket goes down, writing to and flushing the client socket's output stream twice would bubble up a client exception. That seems a little keepalive-ish, but I'm not sure whether that sort of thing would do other transports any good.