[CLJ-980] Documentation for extend-type falsely implies that & is allowed in protocol fn signatures Created: 03/May/12 Updated: 19/Dec/12
The documentation for extend-type contains the following example:
However, [x y & zs] is not a valid parameter list for a protocol fn. The documentation should be appropriately amended.
|Comment by John Szakmeister [ 25/May/12 4:00 AM ]|
v2 of the patch is simply converts the patch to git format. I made sure that Mr. Duffy got proper attribution. I also took a stab at a simple log message. Any problems with the latter are mine, and I'm happy to fix it up if necessary.
|Comment by Aaron Bedra [ 15/Aug/12 10:08 PM ]|
This doesn't update the entire doc string. The expansion is updated, but the signature section isn't. Here's what shows up.
|Comment by Tassilo Horn [ 25/Aug/12 6:44 AM ]|
This is very much related to http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1024.
NOTE: While varargs are not supported in protocol declarations, dynamic extension of a protocol via extend (extend-type, extend-protocol) does allow for varargs and also destructuring, cause the method impls are actually normal clojure functions.
So if a Foo protocol declares a (foo [this a b c]) method, you can extend/extend-type/extend-protocol it dynamically using (foo [this & more] (do-magick)) where `a b c` are conflated into the `more` parameter.
However, that doesn't work for method implementations defined by deftype, defrecord, and reify.
So with respect to the facts, the example in the docstring is actually correct, so I'm not sure if it should be changed. However, what's supported in which cases should be documented better as it is right now.