[NREPL-45] Laziness-forcing loses *out* bindings Created: 10/Dec/13 Updated: 12/Apr/14 Resolved: 25/Feb/14
|Reporter:||Colin Jones||Assignee:||Chas Emerick|
This was reported in https://github.com/trptcolin/reply/issues/129
My current theory, outlined there, is that nREPL sets up session bindings for `out`, which since we're creating a lazy seq are lost before nREPL goes to print out the seq for transport back to the nREPL client (REPLy, vim-fireplace, etc.).
Don't have time at the moment to dig in, but can do so later if nobody else gets to it first.
|Comment by Colin Jones [ 21/Feb/14 5:19 PM ]|
OK, more data: this is happening because of https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/tools/nrepl/middleware/pr_values.clj#L23, where the (with-out-str (pr v)) could be the first time a lazy sequence gets forced, so any side effects' printing gets thrown away.
The trick is distinguishing the actual side-effect printing from the printable value when the sequence is being forced. It seems like it comes down to this: we need to force lazy sequences in the same way that printing does, while keeping the value and the print output distinct. The attached patch does this (I opted to make a local instead of using the private #'clojure.core/pr-on).
I think this is good, but wouldn't mind a review before I push it.
|Comment by Chas Emerick [ 25/Feb/14 4:28 AM ]|
I'm going to reply on the reply ticket :-P, as I think the issue probably isn't nREPL.
As for the patch itself, I'm suspicious of printing values twice as a fix for anything. If output isn't being captured properly, then we should find the problem with how we're capturing output, not throw more output at the problem.
|Comment by Chas Emerick [ 25/Feb/14 9:36 AM ]|
Take a look at this, Colin. Your solution was correct, but can just drop into pr-values; with-out-str was too crude a hammer for what pr-values needs.
If you can, verify that this makes REPL-y (and any other tools you're interested in) work as expected. Feel free to commit it, or I can (you should have privs IIRC).
|Comment by Colin Jones [ 25/Feb/14 11:56 AM ]|
Yeah, I definitely like it better in pr-values, where the rest of the printing logic already lives. Committed as bbc5e02b665356e7dc33fe1d78346f17b3dec452.
|Comment by Chas Emerick [ 25/Feb/14 12:04 PM ]|
Nope, thank you. I'll get a release out sometime this week.