<< Back to previous view

[CLJ-2027] bean printing regression from namespace map printing Created: 24/Sep/16  Updated: 26/Sep/16

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.9
Fix Version/s: Release 1.9

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: Trey Sullivan Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: print, regression
Environment:

Clojure 1.9.0-alpha12


Attachments: Text File clj-2027.patch    
Patch: Code and Test
Approval: Vetted

 Description   

The new namespace map printing is causing a failure in printing bean maps (which are proxies that don't support empty):

user=> (bean (java.util.Date.))
UnsupportedOperationException empty  clojure.core.proxy$clojure.lang.APersistentMap$ff19274a.empty (:-1)

user=> (pst *e)
UnsupportedOperationException empty
	clojure.core.proxy$clojure.lang.APersistentMap$ff19274a.empty (:-1)
	clojure.core/empty (core.clj:5151)
	clojure.core/lift-ns (core_print.clj:237)

Cause: The internal lift-ns function calls empty on the map too early (here it doesn't need to call it at all).

Proposed: Defer calling (empty m) until we know map has namespace keywords and namespace maps will be used for printing.

Patch: clj-2027.patch (note that into is not used in the change b/c it has not yet been defined at this point)






[CLJ-2024] Check should specize function specs before checking Created: 19/Sep/16  Updated: 22/Sep/16

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.9
Fix Version/s: Release 1.9

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: James Reeves Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: spec

Attachments: Text File clj-2024.patch    
Patch: Code
Approval: Vetted

 Description   

This code works fine in 1.9.0-alpha12:

(defn f [x] (+ x 1))
(s/def f (s/fspec :args (s/cat :x number?) :ret number?))
(stest/check `f)

But if we factor the fspec out into its own keyword:

(defn f [x] (+ x 1))
(s/def ::inc (s/fspec :args (s/cat :x number?) :ret number?))
(s/def f ::inc)
(stest/check `f)

The check fails with the exception:

({:failure #error {
 :cause "No :args spec"
 :data #:clojure.spec{:failure :no-args-spec}
 :via
 [{:type clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo
   :message "No :args spec"
   :data #:clojure.spec{:failure :no-args-spec}
   :at [...]}]
 :trace
 [...]}, :sym user/f, :spec :user/inc})

The check function doesn't seem to be resolving ::inc, when presumably it should.






[CLJ-1790] Error extending protocols to Java arrays Created: 29/Jul/15  Updated: 07/Jun/16

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.6, Release 1.7, Release 1.8
Fix Version/s: Release 1.9

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: Mike Anderson Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 2
Labels: compiler, protocols

Attachments: Text File 0001-CLJ-1790-emit-a-cast-to-the-interface-during-procol-.patch    
Patch: Code
Approval: Vetted

 Description   

First reported from core.matrix, but here's a smaller repro:

user=> (defprotocol p (f [_]))
p
user=> (fn [] (f (object-array [])))

VerifyError (class: user$eval15920$fn__15921, method: invoke signature: ()Ljava/lang/Object;) Incompatible object argument for function call  user/eval15920 (form-init9183379085801704163.clj:1)

Cause: The jvm verifier doesn't like situations where we have an array on the stack typed as such, and on a later codepath it is used as target for an invokeinterface even if that path is unreachable because of a previous instance check.

Here's an explanation of exactly our case in pseudo bytecode:

load obj // Object[]
 dup
 instanceof SomeInterface
 iftruejmp label1
 pop
 jmp end
label1:
 // here is where the verifier chokes.
 // it can figure out that the target is of type Object[] which can never be a SomeInterface
 // but it cannot figure out that this code path can never be reached because of the previous
 // instance check with jump
 // to fix this we need to insert an explicit checkcast to SomeInterface on the target
 invokeinterface SomeInterface/someMethod
end:
 return

Proposed: Insert an explicit checkcast to the interface on the target.

Also see: CLJ-1381

Patch: 0001-CLJ-1790emit-a-cast-to-the-interface-during-procol.patch



 Comments   
Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 06/Nov/15 3:53 PM ]

Mike Anderson does 1.8.0-beta2 fix this issue?
Alex Miller if core.matrix is still affected this must be fixed before 1.8.0 as it'd mean that direct linking is still broken

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 06/Nov/15 6:26 PM ]

I could reproduce the bug with 1.8.0-beta2 btw

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 06/Nov/15 7:27 PM ]

Apparently this is not a 1.8 regression.

At least 1.6 and 1.7 both manifest the same issue:

Clojure 1.6.0
user=> (defprotocol p (f [_]))
p
user=> (fn [] (f (object-array [])))

VerifyError (class: user$eval15920$fn__15921, method: invoke signature: ()Ljava/lang/Object;) Incompatible object argument for function call  user/eval15920 (form-init9183379085801704163.clj:1)

Comment by Michael Blume [ 06/Nov/15 8:24 PM ]

Do we know why core.matrix works with Clojure 1.6/1.7 then?

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 06/Nov/15 9:09 PM ]

It doesn't.

Clojure 1.7.0
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_60-b27

user=> (require 'clojure.core.matrix.protocols)
nil
user=> (clojure.core.matrix.protocols/construct-matrix (object-array 1) [1])

VerifyError (class: user$eval6935, method: invoke signature: ()Ljava/lang/Object;) Incompatible object argument for function call  java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0 (Class.java:-2)
user=>

I attached a patch that fixes this issue.
It's caused by the jvm verifier understanding that the object on the stack is an array and thus can never be an instance of the protcol interface, but not being able to understant that the code path leading to the direct protocol interface method invocation can never be reached because of a branch guided by an instance check for that interface on the target

Comment by Mike Anderson [ 06/Nov/15 10:10 PM ]

Apologies, it is possible I just hadn't tested this code path thoroughly before.

It only seems to get triggered in certain circumstances, the following behaviour is interesting:

=> (let [o (identity (object-array 1))]
     (clojure.core.matrix.protocols/dimensionality o))
1
=> (let [o (object-array 1)]
     (clojure.core.matrix.protocols/dimensionality o))
VerifyError (class: clojure/core/matrix$eval17775, method: invokeStatic signature: ()Ljava/lang/Object;) Incompatible object argument for function call  java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0 (:-2)

Perhaps it only happens when the callsite has type information about the protocol parameter?

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 07/Nov/15 4:53 AM ]

Correct, apparently the jvm verifier doesn't like situations where we have an array on the stack typed as such, and on a later codepath it is used as target for an invokeinterface even if that path is unreachable because of a previous instance check.

here's an explaination of exactly our case in pseudo bytecode:

..
 load obj // Object[]
 dup
 instanceof SomeInterface
 iftruejmp label1
 pop
 jmp end
label1:
 // here is where the verifier chokes.
 // it can figure out that the target is of type Object[] which can never be a SomeInterface
 // but it cannot figure out that this code path can never be reached because of the previous
 // instance check with jump
 // to fix this we need to insert an explicit checkcast to SomeInterface on the target
 invokeinterface SomeInterface/someMethod
end:
 return




Generated at Tue Sep 27 05:38:04 CDT 2016 using JIRA 4.4#649-r158309.