Timothy, I tried applying both of these Sep 26, 2012 patches to latest Clojure master as of that date. I had to apply 0001-make-PersistentQueue-ctor-public.patch by hand since it failed to apply using git or patch. It built fine, but failed to pass several of the Clojure tests. Have you looked into those test failures to see if you can find the cause and fix them? I tested on Ubuntu 11.10 with Oracle JDK 1.6 and 1.7, and saw similar failures with both.

Fixed the patch. Tests pass, created the patch, applied it to a different copy of the source and the tests still pass. So this new patch should be good to go.

Timothy, I'm not sure how you are getting successful results when applying this patch. Can you try the steps below and see what happens for you? I get errors trying to apply the patch with latest Clojure master as of Oct 26, 2012. Also please use the steps on the JIRA workflow page to create a git format patch (http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/JIRA+workflow under "Development" heading).

% git clone git://github.com/clojure/clojure.git
% cd clojure
% patch -p1 < queues.patch
patching file src/clj/clojure/core.clj
patching file src/jvm/clojure/lang/PersistentQueue.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 32.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED – saving rejects to file src/jvm/clojure/lang/PersistentQueue.java.rej
patching file test/clojure/test_clojure/data_structures.clj
Hunk #1 succeeded at 123 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 861 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 872.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED – saving rejects to file test/clojure/test_clojure/data_structures.clj.rej
patching file test/clojure/test_clojure/java_interop.clj

I was using git apply. I tried the method you show above, and now I'm seeing the same issues you show above.

Just so you know, the preferred way to create and apply patches are the "git format-patch master --stdout > patch.txt" to create a patch (after doing the branching commands described on the JIRA workflow page to create a branch for your changes), and the "git am --keep-cr -s < patch.txt" to apply a patch. If a patch was created that way and applies cleanly with that command, then you are definitely good to go.

The "patch -p1 < patch.txt" command is just a secondary method sometimes used to try to apply patches that aren't in the format produced above, or have errors when applying using that method.

Just so you know, the preferred way to create and apply patches are the "git format-patch master --stdout > patch.txt" to create a patch (after doing the branching commands described on the JIRA workflow page to create a branch for your changes), and the "git am --keep-cr -s < patch.txt" to apply a patch. If a patch was created that way and applies cleanly with that command, then you are definitely good to go.

The "patch -p1 < patch.txt" command is just a secondary method sometimes used to try to apply patches that aren't in the format produced above, or have errors when applying using that method.

added patch

That one applies cleanly and passes all tests. It should show up on the next list of prescreened patches. Thanks.

we don't use the queue* convention elsewhere, e.g. vec and vector. I think queue should take a collection like vec and set. (queue [1 2 3]) could be made to 'adopt' the collection as front.

Patch queue.patch dated Oct 26 2012 no longer applies cleanly after recent CLJ-1000 commits, but only because of one line of changed patch context. It still applies cleanly with "patch -p1 < queue.patch". Not bothering to update the stale patch given Rich's comments suggesting more substantive changes.

See also CLJ-976 (tagged literal support for PersistentQueue)

Don't want to step on Timothy B's toes here, but it looks straightforward to adopt his patch to implement Rich's suggestion. I'd offer to give it a whack if nobody else wants the ticket now.

Discussion initiated on clojure-dev: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/clojure-dev/2BOqHm24Vc4

This patch (if accepted) supersedes Timothy Baldridge's patch; it implements "queue" and "queue?" (but not "queue*"); "queue" accepts a collection rather than being a variadic function, as per Rich's suggestion.

I think the non-eval behavior would be consistent with the other reader literals in Clojure 1.4. It's definitely better for interop where some other language implementation could be expected to handle a few literal representations, but not the evaluation of Clojure expressions. Use a regular function if the args need evaluation.

The precedent of records seems relevant:

=> (defrecord A [b])
user.A
=> #user.A[(+ 4 5)]
#user.A{:b (+ 4 5)}
=> #user.A{:b (+ 4 5)}
#user.A{:b (+ 4 5)}

This continues to make sense, as otherwise queues would need to print with an extra (quote …) form around lists — which records neatly avoid:

=> (A. '(+ 4 5))
#user.A{:b (+ 4 5)}

Does this mean that a queue fn (analogous to vector, maybe) will also make an appearance? It'd be handy for HOF usage.

Added a patch for the tagged literal support ONLY. This is only one part of the total solution. This provides the read-string and printing capability. I'd like more discussion around the eval side before I get dive into the compiler.

In addition to Chas' observations on consistency with record literals, would eval in queue literals open up the same security hole as #=, needing to respect *read-eval*?
When needing eval inside a queue literal, embedding a #= seems more apropos.

Evalable queue literal support.

Neither of the patches CLJ-976-queue-literal-tagged-parse-support-only.diff dated Apr 27, 2012 nor CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval.diff dated May 4, 2012 apply cleanly to latest master as of May 10, 2012.

Updated patch file to merge with latest master.

New patch with support fixed for syntax-quote.

Patch does not apply as of commit f5f4faf95051f794c9bfa0315e4457b600c84cef

Weird. I was able to download the CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote.diff patch and apply it to HEAD as of just now (f5f4faf95051f794c9bfa0315e4457b600c84cef). There were whitespace warnings, but the patch applied, compiles and passes all tests.

With latest head I was able to successfully apply patch CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote.diff with this command:

git am --keep-cr -s < CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote.diff

with some warnings, but successfully applied. If I try it without the --keep-cr option, the patch fails to apply. I believe this is often a sign that either one of the files being patched, or the patch itself, contains CR/LF line endings, which some of the Clojure source files definitely do.

The command above (with --keep-cr) is currently the one recommended for applying patches on page http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/JIRA+workflow in section "Screening Tickets". I added the suggested --keep-cr option after running across another patch that applied with the option, but not without it.

Presumptuously changing Approval from Incomplete back to Test, since the latest patch does apply cleanly if --keep-cr option is used.

this needs more time

Rich,

Do you mind providing a little more detail? I would be happy to make any changes if needed. However, if it's just a matter of its relationship to EDN and/or waiting until the next release then I am happy to wait. In either case, I'd like to complete this or push it to the back of my mind. Thanks.

clj-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote-patch-v2.txt dated Oct 5 2012 is identical to Fogus's patch CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote.diff dated Jul 20 2012. It simply removes one line addition to clojure.iml that Rich has since added in a different commit, so that this patch now applies cleanly to latest master.

clj-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote-patch-v3.txt dated oct 16 2012 is identical to Fogus's patch CLJ-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote.diff dated Jul 20 2012. It simply removes one line addition to clojure.iml that Rich has since added in a different commit, so that this patch now applies cleanly to latest master.

Fogus, with the recent commit of a patch for CLJ-1070, my touched-up patch clj-976-queue-literal-eval-and-synquote-patch-v3.txt dated Oct 16 2012 doesn't apply cleanly. In this case it isn't simply a few lines of context that have changed, it is the interfaces that PersistentQueue implements have been changed. It might be best if you take a look at the latest code and the patch and consider how it should be updated.

Related to CLJ-1078.