<< Back to previous view

[CLJ-1534] Adding condp-> and condp->> macros to core library Created: 24/Sep/14  Updated: 01/Oct/14

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.7
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Enhancement Priority: Major
Reporter: Kuldeep Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: enhancement, macro

Attachments: File condp-threading-macros-25sept2014.diff    
Patch: Code

 Description   

After introduction of cond-> and cond->> macros in 1.5. It makes sense to have condp-> and condp->> macros in the core library.

(condp-> {}
(complement :a) (assoc :a 1)
:a (assoc :b 2)) ;=> {:b 2, :a 1}

In the above example the result of each expr which was evaluated is being passed to the next predicate.



 Comments   
Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 01/Oct/14 6:37 PM ]

Kuldeep, I cannot comment on whether this change is of interest to the Clojure developers, because I do not know.

I can say that the patch you have attached is not in the expected format. See the page below for instructions on creating a patch in the expected format:

http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Developing+Patches





[CLJ-1407] Recur mismatch might cause multiple evaluation Created: 17/Apr/14  Updated: 17/Apr/14

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Defect Priority: Minor
Reporter: Nicola Mometto Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: compiler, macro


 Description   

Since mismatching recurs cause the loop body to be re-analyzed, macroexpansion in the loop body might happen more than once, causing any side effects that happen during macroexpansion to be evaluated potentially multiple times

Clojure 1.7.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user=> (defmacro x [] (println "foo"))
#'user/x
user=> (fn [] (loop [y 1] (x) (recur (Integer. 1))))
foo
foo
#<user$eval6$fn__7 user$eval6$fn__7@71687585>


 Comments   
Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 17/Apr/14 6:59 PM ]

This is not a question about whether the behavior in the description is a bug or not, but rather a curiosity about how often people write macros that have side effects at macroexpansion time. I think the following in Clojure itself do, but there may be others:

  • gen-class, and also ns because it uses gen-class
  • gen-interface, and also definterface because it uses gen-interface
  • clojure.core/compile-if (private) calls eval on its expr arg, but as used now doesn't cause macroexpansion-time side effects
  • doc seems to have one case that prints at macroexpansion time
  • I am not sure whether defprotocol or deftype have macroexpansion time side effects, or whether they are limited to run time
Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 17/Apr/14 9:20 PM ]

Andy, I don't think there are that many macros that side-effect at macroexpansion time and I haven't discovered this bug in real code but while thinking about how loop locals invalidation was implemented in Compiler.java.

Because there are a really a small number of side-effecting macros, this is unlikely to cause problems in real code, so I changed the priority to minor.





[CLJ-1279] Fix confusing macroexpand1 ArityException handling Created: 16/Oct/13  Updated: 05/Feb/14

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.6
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: Alex Coventry Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: Compiler, errormsgs, macro

Attachments: Text File 0001-Edit-macro-ArityException-in-AFn.patch     Text File 0001-Fix-macroexpand1-s-handling-of-ArityException.patch    
Patch: Code and Test

 Description   

macros can give very confusing error messages when they execute a form which generates an ArityException. clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand1 assumes that any ArityException comes from the call to the macro itself, which need not be the case. For instance:

user> (do (defmacro f [] (assoc)) (f))
ArityException Wrong number of args (-2) passed to: core$assoc clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand1 (Compiler.java:6488)
user> (use 'clojure.repl) (pst)
nil
ArityException Wrong number of args (-2) passed to: core$assoc
clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand1 (Compiler.java:6488)
clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand (Compiler.java:6544)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6618)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6624)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6597)
clojure.core/eval (core.clj:2864)
clojure.main/repl/read-eval-print-6596/fn-6599 (main.clj:260)
clojure.main/repl/read-eval-print--6596 (main.clj:260)
clojure.main/repl/fn--6605 (main.clj:278)
clojure.main/repl (main.clj:278)
clojure.tools.nrepl.middleware.interruptible-eval/evaluate/fn--1251 (interruptible_eval.clj:56)
clojure.core/apply (core.clj:617)
nil

Easy enough to see the source of the problem in this case, but because both the number of arguments actually passed is off by two, and the stacktrace element for the call to assoc has been dropped, this shortcut by macroexpand1 can get super confusing.

The attached patch corrects this behavior. E.g.

user=> (do (defmacro f [] (assoc)) (f))
ArityException Wrong number of args (0) passed to: core$assoc clojure.lang.AFn.throwArity (AFn.java:437)
user=> (use 'clojure.repl) (pst)
nil
ArityException Wrong number of args (0) passed to: core$assoc
user/f (NO_SOURCE_FILE:1)
clojure.lang.Var.invoke (Var.java:419)
clojure.lang.Var.applyTo (Var.java:532)
clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand1 (Compiler.java:6507)
clojure.lang.Compiler.macroexpand (Compiler.java:6580)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6654)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6660)
clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6633)
clojure.core/eval (core.clj:2864)
clojure.main/repl/read-eval-print-6594/fn-6597 (main.clj:260)
clojure.main/repl/read-eval-print--6594 (main.clj:260)
clojure.main/repl/fn--6603 (main.clj:278)
nil



 Comments   
Comment by Alex Coventry [ 17/Oct/13 11:01 AM ]

Patch with test

Comment by Alex Coventry [ 23/Oct/13 11:42 PM ]

Amended patch to deal more gracefully with unexpected stack trace structure.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 24/Oct/13 12:09 AM ]

Also see CLJ-397 and CLJ-383.

Comment by Alex Coventry [ 24/Oct/13 2:46 PM ]

Thanks, Alex. It would be easy enough to move most of the logic into ArityException, which would be a compromise between Stu's[1] options 1 and 2. Is that worth doing?

Amending clojure.lang.AFn.throwArity to check whether "this" is a macro and adjust the arg count there accordingly might be the simplest way. I can see why Rich prefers all the logic to go into ArityException, but since ArityExceptions are used for things other than macros, I don't see a way to make an honest error message there without groveling the stack trace.

[1] http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-397?focusedCommentId=24090&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-24090

Comment by Alex Miller [ 24/Oct/13 2:57 PM ]

I would have to take more time than I have to make an informed opinion but I can say that from a general point of view inspecting StackTraceElements does not seem like the right solution to (almost) any problem.

Comment by Alex Coventry [ 24/Oct/13 10:26 PM ]

This patch causes Var.setMacro to set instance attribute AFn.macrop to true, so that AFn.throwArity can reduce the number of arguments reported.

I'm not used to negotiating java class hierarchies, so it's possible there's a cleaner way. Since Var.fn() returns an IFn, I added macrop handling methods IFn.setMacro and IFn.isMacro. These then needed to be implemented in Ref and Keyword, as well as AFn (where I wanted them) because they implement the IFn interface but don't inherit from AFn.

The real drawback I see with this approach is the duplicated state, though: ^{:macro true} vs AFn.macrop==true.

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 25/Oct/13 6:33 PM ]

I have not investigated the reason yet, but neither patch applies cleanly after the latest commits to Clojure master on Oct 25 2013. Given that what kinds of solution methods would be acceptable for this issue, it sounds like more thinking and code changes are probably needed anyway before worrying too much about that.





[CLJ-1273] def discards ^:macro when used outside the top-level Created: 02/Oct/13  Updated: 17/Jan/14  Resolved: 17/Jan/14

Status: Closed
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.5
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: André Gustavo Rigon Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: :macro, conditional, def, macro, metadata, top-level


 Description   

If I evaluate

(def ^:macro my-defn1 #'defn)

a macro named 'my-defn1' is defined, which I can use just like 'defn'.

However, if I evaluate instead

(if true
  (def ^:macro my-defn2 #'defn))

the var for 'my-defn2' doesn't have the :macro metadata set and I can't use it as a macro, even though the 'def' form is equal to the previous case.

Here is a complete example:

(def ^:macro my-defn1 #'defn)

(if true
  (def ^:macro my-defn2 #'defn))

(println (meta #'my-defn1))    ; => contains :macro

(println (meta #'my-defn2))    ; => doesn't contain :macro!

(my-defn1 hello1 []
          (println "hello 1"))

(hello1)                       ; => prints "hello 1"

(my-defn2 hello2 []            ; => CompilerException: Unable to resolve 
  (println "hello 2"))         ;    symbol: hello2 in this context


 Comments   
Comment by Gary Fredericks [ 09/Dec/13 1:31 PM ]

I hopped around the code for a while and all I could find is that the bindRoot method in Var.java intentionally clears :macro from the metadata.

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 17/Jan/14 7:03 PM ]

Duplicate of http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1021





Generated at Sat Oct 25 22:10:26 CDT 2014 using JIRA 4.4#649-r158309.