<< Back to previous view

[TTRACE-9] Use aprint when displaying value Created: 29/Oct/14  Updated: 17/Feb/15

Status: Open
Project: tools.trace
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Enhancement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Jérémie Grodziski Assignee: Luc Préfontaine
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: enhancement, print

Attachments: File use-aprint.diff    
Patch: Code and Test


Problem: when trace-ns is used, very long displays in the output stream is very hard to read when the fn calls are important and with voluminous data structure
Solution: Use Aprint library when printing value in the output string, now get syntax hightlighting and better layout of data structure
Tradeoffs: add a new dependency to tools.trace
Tests: yes, modify the cleanup fn to also clean the color information added by aprint, so 100% tests passed

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 30/Oct/14 7:36 AM ]

Jeremie, I am not certain, but I believe it is a policy of Clojure contrib libraries not to depend on libraries other than those in Clojure or Clojure contrib.

Perhaps if new arities were added to some existing tools.trace functions or macros, sprint or any other developer-desired function could be provided as arguments to control how printing occurs?

Comment by Jérémie Grodziski [ 30/Oct/14 8:17 AM ]

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your comment, yes I thought about that and known it would be the greatest concern...
I'll have a look at 2 possibilities:

  • the fastest: add new arg to tools.trace fns and macros for providing a filter that can add the colors and layout
  • the better: see if inlining the aprint code is worth considering, or better add the syntax hightlighting feature in clojure.pprint even though pprint is not used in tools.trace (and along with some neat library like Pretty that could be added to clojure.repl)

In the end, adding aprint (both for color and layout) made a HUGE difference for me in usability...

Comment by Alex Miller [ 30/Oct/14 10:18 AM ]

Andy, that is not a policy afaik, merely a preference to minimize them as much as possible. There are other contribs that have external dependencies. It's up to Luc as the contrib lead whether he thinks this is ok here.

Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 30/Oct/14 10:59 AM ]

I've looked into this. 'Inlining aprint' in tools.trace would be my first choice.
However we need to get Vlad Bokov to fill a CA (I do not see him in the list of contributors)
and to grant us the rights to include part of is source code in tools.trace.

Being a regular user of this tool, I find the arity avenue painful. It happens that we use this in
integrated test mode to nail issues. Then the output goes to a file were tty ansi commands
are not welcomed.

I think we need a mode state to enable/disable this feature. In the repl you would need a single
statement to get the colored output whatever trace fns you are calling. That can be part of your
user profile.

Eventually this could migrate to core.pprint but that will require some time before it ends up in a clojure release.

Meanwhile we can keep this isolated in tools.trace so it can be moved later elsewhere.

Comments ?

Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 30/Oct/14 12:50 PM ]

I sent an email to Vlad and the url to this ticket.
Will have a discussion off line first and then move along with the plan if we can.

Comment by Vlad Bokov [ 31/Oct/14 12:27 AM ]

Hi Jérémie, Alex and Luc,

I'm the author of aprint and really happy about you like my lib
Here are my thoughts about it:

1) I really like the idea to push it into tools.trace
2) Currently all the clojure contrib-libs have same patch acceptance policy as the lang, which I already wondered about https://github.com/clojure/clojure/pull/17#issuecomment-53628365 Try to understand, if a lib depends on another, the last one must share the same policy as the original, which is not the case, as I hardly stop accepting pull requests.
3) If you couldn't change this policy, I see "inlining" as best choice.

Now some points about the question "what will get inlined?"

4) I'm a bit surprised, that people don't share my intent to integrate it with repl like this https://github.com/greglook/whidbey, don't like colors, they simply like the layout. So coloring could be thrown away and we eliminate dependance on clansi. Or I could inline clansi (has MIT license), document a :^dynamic to turn on colors (which will get off by default)
5) Code for compact layout depends on jline and it's definitely won't get inside As such this will remain pprint/print-right-margin default value, which is 72 by default and isn't best choice in my opinion, but let it be. (or do you still run clojure on very old terminals?)
6) I don't see sense in introducing a new one :^dynamic for it, I suggest to rely on pprint/print-pretty and if it's true - use compact layout instead of pprint's default one

As such:

  • i could fill and sign a CA
  • prepare a dependent free patch for you, which includes only compact layout (and colors if you like) controlled by pprint/print-pretty and pprint/print-right-margin
Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 17/Feb/15 9:03 PM ]

Hi Vlad,

any change on this one ?

I am about to issue 0.7.9. Dunno if you had some time to do the above steps.

Luc P.

Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 17/Feb/15 9:05 PM ]


I still punch Clojure code on Hollerith cards so I am in unfamiliar territory when a line
exceeds 80 characters and the last 8 columns are not usable anyway

[TTRACE-10] Add throttling/rate-limiting Created: 01/Feb/15  Updated: 18/Feb/15

Status: Open
Project: tools.trace
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Enhancement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Aaron France Assignee: Luc Préfontaine
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None



I would like to propose adding several features to tools.trace:

  • The ability to trottle tracing using several characteristics:
  • Number of messages logged.
  • Number of times called.
  • Size of output generated
  • Times logged in a given period
  • The ability to trace only certain calls:
  • Trace calls to functions with specific values for their argument

Comment by Aaron France [ 01/Feb/15 10:47 AM ]

I have an implementation of most of this on my branch at github: https://github.com/AeroNotix/tools.trace/tree/alf-implement-throttled-tracing

Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 17/Feb/15 9:01 PM ]

I find this feature interesting but I read the implementation and find it complex.
I would like to simplify it. The count may be done at all times even without the throttling
feature enabled.

I would pass a different wrapper in do-trace-var* depending if the throttling feature is
required or not instead of testing the throttle feature at runtime every time.

I may also want to preserve existing fns that have been made public in the past.

The top level call could be a bit more specific than trace-opts.
Will think about a name. Maybe having top level calls more explicit will make
things clearer and easier to implement while preserving backward compat.

Can you shed some light on why you need a dosync in the throttler ?

I reread the code three/four times but cannot wrap my mind as to why a simple atom
with swap! does not do the job here.

All your refs are in the local scope of the throttler fn, nothing leaks out as far as I can
see. (It's late however...

Luc P.

Comment by Aaron France [ 18/Feb/15 4:41 AM ]

The dosync is for when the function is being called from multiple threads.

[TTRACE-13] Implicitly quote the name space in the trace-ns macro Created: 08/Oct/15  Updated: 08/Oct/15

Status: Open
Project: tools.trace
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Enhancement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Luc Préfontaine Assignee: Luc Préfontaine
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Comment by Luc Préfontaine [ 08/Oct/15 8:57 PM ]

Solved in master, ready for 0.7.10

Generated at Fri Nov 27 22:11:03 CST 2015 using JIRA 4.4#649-r158309.