Quick Search
Browse
Pages
Blog
Labels
Attachments
Mail
Advanced
What’s New
Space Directory
Feed Builder
Keyboard Shortcuts
Confluence Gadgets
Log In
Sign Up
Dashboard
Clojure Design
Copy Page
You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as
anonymous
. You may want to
Log In
if you already have an account. You can also
Sign Up
for a new account.
This page is being edited by
.
Paragraph
Paragraph
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Preformatted
Quote
Bold
Italic
Underline
Colour
More colours
Strikethrough
Subscript
Superscript
Monospace
Clear Formatting
Bullet list
Numbered list
Outdent
Indent
Align left
Align center
Align right
Link
Table
Insert
Insert Content
Image
Link
Attachment
Symbol
Emoticon
Wiki Markup
Horizontal rule
tinymce.confluence.insert_menu.macro_desc
Info
JIRA Issue
Status
Gallery
Tasklist
Table of Contents
Other Macros
Undo
Redo
Keyboard Shortcuts Help
<p><strong>JIRA Audit Notes</strong></p> <p>Possible things to change:</p> <ul> <li>remove regular user permission for fields that should not be edited except by core team: <ul> <li>due date, fix versions (used for release assignment), patch, approval</li> <li>this will cause the fields to simply not appear on data entry screens</li> <li>implies creation of "core" group that still do have these permissions</li> <li>RH - yes</li> </ul> </li> <li>remove all time tracking features other than release assignment <ul> <li>RH -ok</li> </ul> </li> <li>fix default assignment (think things get assigned to project owner, currently Rich) <ul> <li>RH - yes please</li> </ul> </li> <li>create some components <ul> <li>language/docs/??</li> <li>if not, then mask out component field</li> <li>RH - let's wait and see what makes sense <ul> <li>How will contrib libs work?</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>make sure assignment can only be done by core team <ul> <li>again, wat about contrib libs?</li> </ul> </li> <li>run the re-index (apparently necessary but makes JIRA temporarily unavailable)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Design Notes</strong></p> <ul> <li>be mimimalist: we are trying to spend our time innovating in Clojure, not JIRA!</li> <li>capture existing Assembla data with fidelity</li> <li>capture Relevance best practices across a variety of ticketing systems</li> <li>avoid language that presumes defects (or even software)</li> <li>state names represent motion toward goal (usually)</li> <li>states are almost implied by roles</li> <li>don't stay open, or re-open: use references</li> </ul> <p><strong>Basic Workflow</strong></p> <ul> <li>Open | Vetted | In Dev | Ready to Screen | Screened | Accepted | Completed (Closed)</li> <li>Patch status not part of workflow <ul> <li>field for no patch | patch | patch + test</li> </ul> </li> <li>no special "pushed back a step" statuses <ul> <li>e.g. no "Returned to Dev"</li> <li>maybe add field for "pushed backwards at any point"</li> </ul> </li> <li>ticket types: defect | enhancement | task</li> <li>resolutions: completed | declined | duplicate | incomplete</li> </ul> <p><strong>Issues</strong></p> <ul> <li>name choices <ul> <li>vetted ~ ready for dev, approved for dev</li> <li>accepted ~ OK</li> </ul> </li> <li>mechanisms for prodding for action <ul> <li>no equivalent to showcase</li> </ul> </li> <li>does it all work in JIRA? <ul> <li>JIRA out of the box not even close</li> <li>I am reduced to hand-editing XML already. Seems to work, but ouch!</li> </ul> </li> <li>Can JIRA enforce workflow constraints?</li> <li>Where does this get documented?</li> </ul>
Attachments
Labels
Location
< Edit
Preview >
Loading…
Save
Cancel
Next hint
search
attachments
weblink
advanced