Skip to:
Currently says:
"af must close! the channel before returning."
more correctly:
"af is responsible for closing the channel.", or similar.
af is asynchronous so should return immediately, the thread or go-block it spawns should close the channel later.
Released in 1.5.640
Updated for next release
(@Pierre-Yves Ritschard There may be a word missing in the first clause of your comment?)
I cast my vote for this a while ago, but would prefer an even more explicit wording along the lines (native speaker input welcome):
"af must arrange for the channel to be closed eventually before returning."
Seems like an easy fix for a moderately upvoted issue, would you accept a patch for this? (If yes, is the policy to reflow the rest of the paragraph?)
I tend to find the suggested wording, I ended here while wanting to make sure I had understood the intent of the initial docstring correctly.
Currently says:
"af must close! the channel before returning."
more correctly:
"af is responsible for closing the channel.", or similar.
af is asynchronous so should return immediately, the thread or go-block it spawns should close the channel later.