<< Back to previous view

[CLJS-349] cljs.compiler: No defmethod for emit-constant clojure.lang.LazySeq Created: 30/Jul/12  Updated: 27/Jun/17

Status: Open
Project: ClojureScript
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 1.7.145
Fix Version/s: 1.9.671

Type: Defect Priority: Minor
Reporter: Julien Fantin Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Attachments: Text File 0001-CLJS-349-Allow-ISeq-to-be-emitted-by-macros-as-a-con.patch     File fixbug349.diff    


The cljs compiler errors when trying to emit-constant for a clojure.lang.LazySeq.

Example : https://www.refheap.com/paste/3901

Here syms is defined as a LazySeq on line 3, then on line 7 it is quoted. The error is included in the refheap.

Emitting a cljs.core.list for this type seems to solve the issue.

Comment by David Nolen [ 31/Aug/12 9:27 AM ]

Can you identify precisely where a LazySeq is getting emitted here? A LazySeq is not literal so this seems like a bug in the macro to me. I could be wrong. Thanks!

Comment by Herwig Hochleitner [ 28/Oct/12 9:31 PM ]

The lazy seq seems to be introduced on line 7, the '~syms form

`(let [mappings# (into {} (map-indexed #(identity [%2 %1]) '~syms))

Clojure allows lazy-seqs to be embedded: https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java#L4538

As an aside: The relevant protocol is not literality, but the print-dup multimethod. Do / Should we have print-dup in CLJS?

Comment by Herwig Hochleitner [ 31/Oct/12 10:10 PM ]

Attached patch 0001 doesn't add a case for LazySeq, but folds two cases for PersistentList and Cons into one for ISeq.

Comment by David Nolen [ 19/Nov/13 9:28 PM ]

This approach seems acceptable but this is an old patch can we update for master?

Generated at Fri Oct 20 14:52:09 CDT 2017 using JIRA 4.4#649-r158309.