<< Back to previous view

[CLJ-1744] Unused destructured local not cleared, causes memory leak Created: 03/Jun/15  Updated: 19/Aug/16  Resolved: 19/Aug/16

Status: Closed
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: Release 1.9

Type: Defect Priority: Critical
Reporter: Nicola Mometto Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Completed Votes: 17
Labels: compiler, destructuring, locals-clearing, memory

Attachments: Text File 0001-CLJ-1744-clear-unused-locals.patch     Text File 0001-CLJ-1744-clear-unused-locals-v2.patch    
Patch: Code
Approval: Ok


Clojure currently doesn't clear unused locals. This is problematic as some form of destructuring can generate unused/unusable locals that the compiler cannot clear and thus can cause head retention:

;; this works
user=> (loop [xs (repeatedly 2 #(byte-array (quot (.maxMemory (Runtime/getRuntime)) 10)))] (when (seq xs) (recur (rest xs))))
;; this doesn't
user=>  (loop [[x & xs] (repeatedly 200 #(byte-array (quot (.maxMemory (Runtime/getRuntime)) 10)))] (when (seq xs) (recur xs)))
OutOfMemoryError Java heap space  clojure.lang.Numbers.byte_array (Numbers.java:1252)

Here's a macroexpansion that exposes this issue:

user=> (macroexpand-all '(loop [[a & b] c] [a b]))
(let* [G__21 c 
       vec__22 G__21
       a (clojure.core/nth vec__22 0 nil)
       b (clojure.core/nthnext vec__22 1)]
 (loop* [G__21 G__21]
   (let* [vec__23 G__21
          a (clojure.core/nth vec__23 0 nil)
          b (clojure.core/nthnext vec__23 1)]
     [a b])

Cause: The first two bindings of a and b will hold onto the head of c since they are never used and not accessible from the loop body they cannot be cleared.

Approach: Track whether local bindings are used. After evaluating the binding expression, if the local binding is not used and can be cleared, then pop the result rather than storing it.

Patch: 0001-CLJ-1744-clear-unused-locals-v2.patch

Screened by: Alex Miller

Comment by Michael Blume [ 03/Jun/15 12:57 PM ]

Nice =)

Comment by James Henderson [ 18/Nov/15 6:12 AM ]

FYI - we've hit this as a memory leak in our production system:

(defn write-response! [{:keys [products merchant-id] :as search-result} writer response-type]
  ;; not using `search-result` throughout this fn - kept in to document intent
  ;; hangs on to `products`, a large lazy-seq, until it's completely consumed, causes memory leak

  (case response-type
    "application/edn" (print-method products writer)
(defn write-response! [{:keys [products merchant-id]} writer response-type]
  ;; fine, releases earlier elements in products as it flies through the response

  (case response-type
    "application/edn" (print-method products writer)

The work-around in our case is easy enough - removing the unused symbol - but, given we assumed including an unused symbol would be a no-op, it did take us a while to find!



Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 15/Dec/15 11:47 AM ]

While investigating an unrelated memory leak on core.async (ASYNC-138) I discovered that this bug also affects code inside a `go` macro, since it often emits unreachable bindings

clojure.core.async> (macroexpand '(go (let [test (range 1e10)]
                                        (str test (<! (chan))))))
 [c__15123__auto__ (clojure.core.async/chan 1) captured-bindings__15124__auto__ (clojure.lang.Var/getThreadBindingFrame)]
      ([] (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aset-all! (java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray. 9) 0 state-machine__14945__auto__ 1 1))
          (clojure.lang.Var/resetThreadBindingFrame (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 3))
              (clojure.core/int (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 1))
               [inst_17525 (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 7) inst_17525 (range 1.0E10) test inst_17525 inst_17526 str test inst_17525 inst_17527 (chan) state_17532 (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aset-all! state_17532 7 inst_17525 8 inst_17526)]
               (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/take! state_17532 2 inst_17527))
               [inst_17525 (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 7) inst_17526 (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 8) inst_17529 (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aget-object state_17532 2) inst_17530 (inst_17526 inst_17525 inst_17529)]
               (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/return-chan state_17532 inst_17530)))]
            (if (clojure.core/identical? result__14948__auto__ :recur) (recur) result__14948__auto__)))
          (catch java.lang.Throwable ex__14949__auto__ (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aset-all! state_17532 clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/CURRENT-EXCEPTION ex__14949__auto__) (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/process-exception state_17532) :recur)
          (finally (clojure.lang.Var/resetThreadBindingFrame old-frame__14946__auto__)))]
        (if (clojure.core/identical? ret-value__14947__auto__ :recur) (recur state_17532) ret-value__14947__auto__))))
     (clojure.core/-> (f__15125__auto__) (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/aset-all! clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/USER-START-IDX c__15123__auto__ clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/BINDINGS-IDX captured-bindings__15124__auto__))]
    (clojure.core.async.impl.ioc-macros/run-state-machine-wrapped state__15126__auto__))))

[CLJ-1465] SubVector leaks memory by design (?) Created: 14/Jul/14  Updated: 14/Jul/14  Resolved: 14/Jul/14

Status: Closed
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.6
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Defect Priority: Minor
Reporter: Szymon Witamborski Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Declined Votes: 0
Labels: memory


While reading through the code of SubVector class, I've noticed that the only thing that it does is creating a "subview" of an existing vector without doing anything to elements that are not accessible any more. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think this leads to memory leaks in this scenario:

(let [a [1 2 3 4 5]
      b (subvec a 2 3)]

In this example we no longer have any reference to a once the (let...) expression returned. Elements of a that are no longer accessible will not be garbage collected until b is garbage collected because b still holds a reference to a (the v field in SubVector class). Ideally, these elements should be garbage collectible as soon as a is gone.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 14/Jul/14 2:40 PM ]

The subvec docstring says:

"Returns a persistent vector of the items in vector from start (inclusive) to end (exclusive). If end is not supplied, defaults to (count vector). This operation is O(1) and very fast, as the resulting vector shares structure with the original and no trimming is done."

The implementation is intentional to make this a constant-time operation. If you are willing to make the tradeoff re shared structure and object retention, this constant operation has better performance. In other words: working as intended.

[CLJ-1366] The empty map literal is read as a different map each time Created: 01/Mar/14  Updated: 15/May/17

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.5, Release 1.6
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Enhancement Priority: Major
Reporter: Shogo Ohta Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: memory, reader

Attachments: Text File 0001-make-the-reader-return-the-same-empty-map-when-it-re.patch     Text File 0002-make-the-reader-return-the-same-empty-map-when-it-re.patch    
Patch: Code
Approval: Prescreened


As reported here (https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/clojure-dev/n83hlRFsfHg), the empty map literal is read as a different map each time.

user=> (identical? (read-string "{}") (read-string "{}"))

Making the reader return the same empty map when it reads an empty map is expected to improve some memory efficiency, and also lead to consistency with the way other collection literals are read in.

user=> (identical? (read-string "()") (read-string "()"))
user=> (identical? (read-string "[]") (read-string "[]"))
user=> (identical? (read-string "#{}") (read-string "#{}"))

Cause: LispReader calls RT.map() with an empty array when it reads an empty map, and RT.map() in turn makes a new map unless its argument given is null.

Approach: make RT.map() return the same empty map when the argument is an empty array as well, not only when null

Patch: 0002-make-the-reader-return-the-same-empty-map-when-it-re.patch

Prescreened by: Alex Miller

Comment by Shogo Ohta [ 01/Mar/14 2:59 AM ]

Sorry, the patch 0001-make-the-reader-return-the-same-empty-map-when-it-re.patch didn't work.

The updated patch 0002-make-the-reader-return-the-same-empty-map-when-it-re.patch works, but I'm afraid it'd be beyond the scope of this ticket since it modifies RT.map() behavior a bit.

[CLJ-1250] Reducer (and folder) instances hold onto the head of seqs Created: 03/Sep/13  Updated: 07/Aug/15  Resolved: 07/Aug/15

Status: Closed
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.5
Fix Version/s: Release 1.8

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: Christophe Grand Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Completed Votes: 10
Labels: compiler, memory, reducers

Attachments: Text File after-change.txt     Text File before-change.txt     Text File CLJ-1250-08-29.patch     Text File CLJ-1250-08-29-ws.patch     Text File CLJ-1250-20131211.patch     Text File clj-1250-2.patch     Text File CLJ-1250-AllInvokeSites-20140204.patch     Text File CLJ-1250-AllInvokeSites-20140320.patch     Text File clj1250.patch     Text File do-not-clear-this-when-direct-linked.patch    
Patch: Code and Test
Approval: Vetted


Problem Statement
A shared function #'clojure.core.reducers/reducer holds on to the head of a reducible collection, causing it to blow up when the collection is a lazy sequence.

Reproduction steps:
Compare the following calls:

(time (reduce + 0 (map identity (range 1e8))))
(time (reduce + 0 (r/map identity (range 1e8))))

The second call should fail on a normal or small heap.

(If reducers are faster than seqs, increase the range.)

Cause: #'reducer closes over a collection when in order to reify CollReduce, and the closed-over is never cleared. When code attempts to reduce over this anonymous transformed collection, it will realize the tail while the head is stored in the closed-over.

Patch: clj-1250-2.patch


Clear the reference to 'this' on the stack just before a tail call occurs

Removes calls to emitClearLocals(), which is a no-op.

When the context is RETURN (indicating a tail call), and the operation
is an InvokeExpr, StaticMethodExpr, or InstanceMethodExpr, clear the
reference to 'this' which is in slot 0 of the locals.

Edge-case: Inside the body of a try block, we cannot clear 'this' at the tail
position as we might need to keep refs around for use in the catch or finally
clauses. Introduces another truthy dynamic binding var to track position being
inside a try block.

Adds two helpers to emitClearThis and inTailCall.

Advantages: Fixes this case with no user code changes. Enables GC to do reclaim closed-overs references earlier.
Disadvantages: A compiler change.

Screened by: Alex Miller

Alternate Approaches:

1) Reimplement the #'reducer (and #'folder) transformation fns similar to the manner that Christophe proposes here:

(defrecord Reducer [coll xf])

      (coll-reduce [r f1]
                   (clojure.core.protocols/coll-reduce r f1 (f1)))
      (coll-reduce [r f1 init]
                   (clojure.core.protocols/coll-reduce (:coll r) ((:xf r) f1) init)))

(def rreducer ->Reducer) 

(defn rmap [f coll]
  (rreducer coll (fn [g] 
                   (fn [acc x]
                     (g acc (f x))))))

Advantages: Relatively non-invasive change.
Disadvantages: Not evident code. Additional protocol dispatch, though only incurred once

2) Alternate approach

from Christophe Grand:
Another way would be to enhance the local clearing mechanism to also clear "this" but it's complex since it may be needed to keep a reference to "this" for caches long after obvious references to "this" are needed.

Advantages: Fine-grained
Disadvantages: Complex, invasive, and the compiler is hard to hack on.

Avoid reducing on lazy-seqs and instead operate on vectors / maps, or custom reifiers of CollReduce or CollFold. This could be easier with some implementations of common collection functions being available (like iterate and partition).

See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure-dev/t6NhGnYNH1A/2lXghJS5HywJ for previous discussion.

Comment by Gary Fredericks [ 03/Sep/13 8:53 AM ]

Fixed indentation in description.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 11/Dec/13 11:08 PM ]

Adding a patch that clears "this" before tail calls. Verified that Christophe's repro case is fixed.

Will upload a diff of the bytecode soon.

Any reason this juicy bug was taken off 1.6?

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 11/Dec/13 11:17 PM ]

Here's the bytecode for the clojure.core.reducers/reducer reify before and after the change... Of course a straight diff isn't useful because all the line numbers changed. Kudos to Gary Trakhman for the no.disassemble lein plugin.

Comment by Christophe Grand [ 12/Dec/13 6:58 AM ]

Ghadi, I'm a bit surprised by this part of the patch: was the local clearing always a no-op here?

-		if(context == C.RETURN)
+		if(shouldClear)
-			ObjMethod method = (ObjMethod) METHOD.deref();
-			method.emitClearLocals(gen);
+                            gen.visitInsn(Opcodes.ACONST_NULL);
+                            gen.visitVarInsn(Opcodes.ASTORE, 0);

The problem with this approach (clear this on tail call) is that it adds yet another special case. To me the complexity stem from having to keep this around even if the user code doesn't refer to it.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 12/Dec/13 7:19 AM ]

Thank you - I failed to mention this in the commit message: it appears that emitClearLocals() belonging to both ObjMethod and FnMethod (its child) are empty no-ops. I believe the actual local clearing is on line 4855.

I agree re: another special case in the compiler.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 12/Dec/13 8:56 AM ]

Ghadi re 1.6 - this ticket was never in the 1.6 list, it has not yet been vetted by Rich but is ready to do so when we open up again after 1.6.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 12/Dec/13 8:59 AM ]

Sorry I confused the critical list with the Rel1.6 list.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 14/Dec/13 11:16 AM ]

New patch 20131214 that handles all tail invoke sites (InvokeExpr + StaticMethodExpr + InstanceMethodExpr). 'StaticInvokeExpr' seems like an old remnant that had no active code path, so that was left as-is.

The approach taken is still the same as the original small patch that addressed only InvokeExpr, except that it is now using a couple small helpers. The commit message has more details.

Also a 'try' block with no catch or finally clause now becomes a BodyExpr. Arguably a user error, historically accepted, and still accepted, but now they are a regular BodyExpr, instead of being wrapped by a the no-op try/catch mechanism. This second commit can be optionally discarded.

With this patch on my machine (4/8 core/thread Ivy Bridge) running on bare clojure.main:
Christophe's test cases both run i 3060ms on a artificially constrained 100M max heap, indicating a dominant GC overhead. (But they now both work!)

When max heap is at a comfortable 2G the reducers version outpaces the lazyseq at 2100ms vs 2600ms!

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 13/Jan/14 10:48 AM ]

Updating stale patch after latest changes to master. Latest is CLJ-1250-AllInvokeSites-20140113

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 04/Feb/14 3:50 PM ]

Updating patch after murmur changes

Comment by Tassilo Horn [ 13/Feb/14 4:52 AM ]

Ghadi, I suffer from the problem of this issue. Therefore, I've applied your patch CLJ-1250-AllInvokeSites-20140204.patch to the current git master. However, then I get lots of "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: array" errors when the clojure tests are run:

     [java] clojure.test-clojure.clojure-set
     [java] java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: array
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__6026.invoke(protocols.clj:123)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__5994$G__5989__6003.invoke(protocols.clj:19)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__6023.invoke(protocols.clj:147)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__5994$G__5989__6003.invoke(protocols.clj:19)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$seq_reduce.invoke(protocols.clj:31)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__6017.invoke(protocols.clj:48)
     [java] 	at clojure.core.protocols$fn__5968$G__5963__5981.invoke(protocols.clj:13)
     [java] 	at clojure.core$reduce.invoke(core.clj:6213)
     [java] 	at clojure.set$difference.doInvoke(set.clj:61)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke(RestFn.java:442)
     [java] 	at clojure.test_clojure.clojure_set$fn__1050$fn__1083.invoke(clojure_set.clj:109)
     [java] 	at clojure.test_clojure.clojure_set$fn__1050.invoke(clojure_set.clj:109)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_var$fn__7123.invoke(test.clj:704)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_var.invoke(test.clj:704)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_vars$fn__7145$fn__7150.invoke(test.clj:721)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$default_fixture.invoke(test.clj:674)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_vars$fn__7145.invoke(test.clj:721)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$default_fixture.invoke(test.clj:674)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_vars.invoke(test.clj:718)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_all_vars.invoke(test.clj:727)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$test_ns.invoke(test.clj:746)
     [java] 	at clojure.core$map$fn__2665.invoke(core.clj:2515)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.LazySeq.sval(LazySeq.java:40)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.LazySeq.seq(LazySeq.java:49)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Cons.next(Cons.java:39)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RT.boundedLength(RT.java:1655)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo(RestFn.java:130)
     [java] 	at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:619)
     [java] 	at clojure.test$run_tests.doInvoke(test.clj:761)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo(RestFn.java:137)
     [java] 	at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:617)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$run_all_tests$fn__527.invoke(runner.clj:255)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$run_all_tests$run_with_counts__519$fn__523.invoke(runner.clj:251)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$run_all_tests$run_with_counts__519.invoke(runner.clj:251)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$run_all_tests.invoke(runner.clj:253)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$test_dirs.doInvoke(runner.clj:304)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo(RestFn.java:137)
     [java] 	at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:617)
     [java] 	at clojure.test.generative.runner$_main.doInvoke(runner.clj:312)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke(RestFn.java:408)
     [java] 	at user$eval564.invoke(run_tests.clj:3)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Compiler.eval(Compiler.java:6657)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Compiler.load(Compiler.java:7084)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Compiler.loadFile(Compiler.java:7040)
     [java] 	at clojure.main$load_script.invoke(main.clj:274)
     [java] 	at clojure.main$script_opt.invoke(main.clj:336)
     [java] 	at clojure.main$main.doInvoke(main.clj:420)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke(RestFn.java:408)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Var.invoke(Var.java:379)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:154)
     [java] 	at clojure.lang.Var.applyTo(Var.java:700)
     [java] 	at clojure.main.main(main.java:37)
Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 13/Feb/14 8:23 AM ]

Can you give some details about your JVM/environment that can help reproduce? I'm not encountering this error.

Comment by Tassilo Horn [ 13/Feb/14 9:41 AM ]

Sure. It's a 64bit ThinkPad running GNU/Linux.

% java -version
java version "1.7.0_51"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.4.5) (ArchLinux build 7.u51_2.4.5-1-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.51-b03, mixed mode)
Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 13/Feb/14 10:19 AM ]

Strange, that is exactly my mail env, OpenJDK7 on Arch, 64-bit. I have also tested on JDK 6/7/8 on OSX mavericks. Are you certain that the git tree is clean besides the patch? (Arch users unite!)

Comment by Tassilo Horn [ 14/Feb/14 1:13 AM ]

Yes, the tree is clean. But now I see that I get the same error also after resetting to origin/master, so it's not caused by your patch at all. Oh, now the error vanished after doing a `mvn clean`! So problem solved.

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 19/Feb/14 12:32 PM ]

Ghandi, FnExpr.parse should bind IN_TRY_BLOCK to false before analyzing the fn body, consider the case

(try (do something (fn a [] (heap-consuming-op a))) (catch Exception e ..))

Here in the a function the this local will never be cleared even though it's perfectly safe to.
Admittedly this is an edge case but we should cover this possibility too.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 19/Feb/14 2:06 PM ]

You may have auto-corrected my name to Ghandi instead of Ghadi. I wish I were that wise =)

I will update the patch for FnExpr (that seems reasonable), but maybe after 1.6 winds down and the next batch of tickets get scrutiny. It would be nice to get input on a preferred approach from Rich or core after it gets vetted – or quite possibly not vetted.

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 19/Feb/14 6:11 PM ]

hah, sorry for the typo on the name

Seems reasonable to me, in the meantime I just pushed to tools.analyzer/tools.emitter complete support for "this" clearing, I'll test this a bit in the next few days to make sure it doesn't cause unexpected problems.

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 24/Feb/14 12:13 PM ]

Patch CLJ-1250-AllInvokeSites-20140204.patch no longer applies cleanly to latest master as of Feb 23, 2014. It did on Feb 14, 2014. Most likely some of its context lines are changed by the commit to Clojure master on Feb 23, 2014 – I haven't checked in detail.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 20/Mar/14 4:39 PM ]

Added a patch that 1) applies cleanly, 2) binds the IN_TRY_EXPR to false initially when analyzing FnExpr and 3) uses RT.booleanCast

Comment by Alex Miller [ 22/Aug/14 9:31 AM ]

Can you squash the patch and add tests to cover all this stuff?

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 22/Aug/14 9:47 AM ]

Sure. Have any ideas for how to test proper behavior of reference clearing? Know of some prior art in the test suite?

Comment by Alex Miller [ 22/Aug/14 10:25 AM ]

Something like the test in the summary would be a place to start. I don't know of any test that actually inspects bytecode or anything but that's probably not wise anyways. Need to make that kind of a test but get coverage on the different kinds of scenarios you're covering - try/catch, etc.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 22/Aug/14 12:13 PM ]

Attached new squashed patch with a couple of tests.

Removed (innocuous but out-of-scope) second commit that analyzed try blocks missing a catch or finally clause as BodyExprs

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 29/Aug/14 11:43 AM ]

Rebased to latest master. Current patch CLJ-1250-08-29

Comment by Jozef Wagner [ 29/Aug/14 2:40 PM ]

CLJ-1250-08-29.patch is fishy, 87k size and it includes many unrelated commits

Comment by Alex Miller [ 29/Aug/14 2:44 PM ]

Agreed, Ghadi that last rebase looks wrong.

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 29/Aug/14 3:06 PM ]

Oops. Used format-patch against the wrong base. Updated.

Apologies that ticket is longer than War & Peace

Comment by Alex Miller [ 08/Sep/14 7:02 PM ]

I have not had enough time to examine all the bytecode diffs that I want to on this yet but preliminary feedback:


  • need to use tabs instead of spaces to blend into the existing code better
  • why do StaticFieldExpr and InstanceFieldExpr not need this same logic?


  • has some whitespace diffs that you could get rid of
  • there seem to be more cases in the code than are covered in the tests here?
Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 08/Sep/14 11:19 PM ]

The germ of the issue is to clear the reference to 'this' (arg 0) when transferring control to another activation frame. StaticFieldExpr and InstanceFieldExpr do not transfer control to another frame. (StaticMethod and InstanceMethod do transfer control, and are covered by the patch)

Comment by Alex Miller [ 25/Sep/14 9:03 AM ]

Makes sense - can you address the tabs and whitespace issues?

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 26/Sep/14 12:51 PM ]

Latest patch CLJ-1250-08-29-ws.patch with whitespace issues fixed.

Comment by Michael Blume [ 17/Jun/15 4:43 PM ]

Patch doesn't apply, will attempt to fix and upload

Comment by Michael Blume [ 17/Jun/15 4:58 PM ]

Nope, sorry, admitting defeat on this one. Ghadi, can you update?

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 22/Jun/15 9:40 PM ]

I've updated the patch for first 1.8 merge window.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 23/Jun/15 7:37 AM ]

Added clj-1250-2.patch which is same as clj1250.patch but squashes commits and fixes whitespace tab/space issues.

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 17/Jul/15 8:24 PM ]

Not sure what it means but the testcase is failing with an OOM exception in the IBM JDK 1.6 instance http://build.clojure.org/job/clojure-test-matrix/284/jdk=IBM%20JDK%201.6/console

Comment by Alex Miller [ 17/Jul/15 10:29 PM ]

CLJ-1780 created to track the ibm failure. maybe just difference in gc speed or something?

Comment by Alex Miller [ 04/Aug/15 2:32 PM ]

Here's a greatly simplified version of some real code that now fails due to this change:

(let [done (atom 2)]
    (while (pos? @done)
      (swap! done dec)
      (loop [found []]
        (println (conj found 1)))))
  • Before: [1][1]
  • After: [1] NullPointerException
Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 04/Aug/15 5:18 PM ]

Reproduced on 1.8.0-alpha4. Could not reproduce with the previously committed patch applied directly to 1.7.

Cause: Tail clearing is insensitive to direct linking

In a direct linking static method (through invokeStatic) there's no "this" to clear.

Patch addresses the root cause

Comment by Alex Miller [ 05/Aug/15 9:02 AM ]

Ok, backing out a little, here's another example that still fails with the patch:

(let [done (atom false)
        f (future-call
            (fn inner []
              (while (not @done)
                (loop [found []]
                  (println (conj found 1))))))]
    (doseq [elem [:a :b :c :done]]
      (println "queue write " elem))
    (reset! done true)

queue write :a
queue write :b
queue write :c
queue write :done

queue write :a
queue write :b
queue write :c
queue write :done

Comment by Alex Miller [ 05/Aug/15 10:58 AM ]

Moved latest case to CLJ-1793

Comment by Ghadi Shayban [ 05/Aug/15 8:44 PM ]

Both this regression and the loop regression are fixed on CLJ-1793.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 07/Aug/15 8:56 AM ]

The patch for this ticket has been reverted in master after 1.8.0-alpha4. Further work on re-implementation is moved to CLJ-1793.

[CLJ-1152] PermGen leak in multimethods and protocol fns when evaled Created: 30/Jan/13  Updated: 10/Nov/17

Status: Open
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Release 1.4
Fix Version/s: Release 1.10

Type: Defect Priority: Major
Reporter: Chouser Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 10
Labels: memory, protocols

Attachments: File naive-lru-for-multimethods-and-protocols.diff     File protocol_multifn_weak_ref_cache.diff    
Patch: Code
Approval: Incomplete


There is a PermGen memory leak that we have tracked down to protocol methods and multimethods called inside an eval, because of the caches these methods use. The problem only arises when the value being cached is an instance of a class (such as a function or reify) that was defined inside the eval. Thus extending IFn or dispatching a multimethod on an IFn are likely triggers.

Reproducing: The easiest way that I have found to test this is to set "-XX:MaxPermSize" to a reasonable value so you don't have to wait too long for the PermGen spaaaaace to fill up, and to use "-XX:+TraceClassLoading" and "-XX:+TraceClassUnloading" to see the classes being loaded and unloaded.

leiningen project.clj
(defproject permgen-scratch "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT"
  :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure "1.5.0-RC1"]]
  :jvm-opts ["-XX:MaxPermSize=32M"

You can use lein swank 45678 and connect with slime in emacs via M-x slime-connect.

To monitor the PermGen usage, you can find the Java process to watch with "jps -lmvV" and then run "jstat -gcold <PROCESS_ID> 1s". According to the jstat docs, the first column (PC) is the "Current permanent space capacity (KB)" and the second column (PU) is the "Permanent space utilization (KB)". VisualVM is also a nice tool for monitoring this.

Multimethod leak

Evaluating the following code will run a loop that eval's (take* (fn foo [])).

multimethod leak
(defmulti take* (fn [a] (type a)))

(defmethod take* clojure.lang.Fn

(def stop (atom false))
(def sleep-duration (atom 1000))

(defn run-loop []
  (when-not @stop
    (eval '(take* (fn foo [])))
    (Thread/sleep @sleep-duration)

(future (run-loop))

(reset! sleep-duration 0)

In the lein swank session, you will see many lines like below listing the classes being created and loaded.

[Loaded user$eval15802$foo__15803 from __JVM_DefineClass__]
[Loaded user$eval15802 from __JVM_DefineClass__]

These lines will stop once the PermGen space fills up.

In the jstat monitoring, you'll see the amount of used PermGen space (PU) increase to the max and stay there.

-    PC       PU        OC          OU       YGC    FGC    FGCT     GCT
 31616.0  31552.7    365952.0         0.0      4     0    0.000    0.129
 32000.0  31914.0    365952.0         0.0      4     0    0.000    0.129
 32768.0  32635.5    365952.0         0.0      4     0    0.000    0.129
 32768.0  32767.6    365952.0      1872.0      5     1    0.000    0.177
 32768.0  32108.2    291008.0     23681.8      6     2    0.827    1.006
 32768.0  32470.4    291008.0     23681.8      6     2    0.827    1.006
 32768.0  32767.2    698880.0     24013.8      8     4    1.073    1.258
 32768.0  32767.2    698880.0     24013.8      8     4    1.073    1.258
 32768.0  32767.2    698880.0     24013.8      8     4    1.073    1.258

A workaround is to run prefer-method before the PermGen space is all used up, e.g.

(prefer-method take* clojure.lang.Fn java.lang.Object)

Then, when the used PermGen space is close to the max, in the lein swank session, you will see the classes created by the eval'ing being unloaded.

[Unloading class user$eval5950$foo__5951]
[Unloading class user$eval3814]
[Unloading class user$eval2902$foo__2903]
[Unloading class user$eval13414]

In the jstat monitoring, there will be a long pause when used PermGen space stays close to the max, and then it will drop down, and start increasing again when more eval'ing occurs.

-    PC       PU        OC          OU       YGC    FGC    FGCT     GCT
 32768.0  32767.9    159680.0     24573.4      6     2    0.167    0.391
 32768.0  32767.9    159680.0     24573.4      6     2    0.167    0.391
 32768.0  17891.3    283776.0     17243.9      6     2   50.589   50.813
 32768.0  18254.2    283776.0     17243.9      6     2   50.589   50.813

The defmulti defines a cache that uses the dispatch values as keys. Each eval call in the loop defines a new foo class which is then added to the cache when take* is called, preventing the class from ever being GCed.

The prefer-method workaround works because it calls clojure.lang.MultiFn.preferMethod, which calls the private MultiFn.resetCache method, which completely empties the cache.

Protocol leak

The leak with protocol methods similarly involves a cache. You see essentially the same behavior as the multimethod leak if you run the following code using protocols.

protocol leak
(defprotocol ITake (take* [a]))

(extend-type clojure.lang.Fn
  (take* [this] '()))

(def stop (atom false))
(def sleep-duration (atom 1000))

(defn run-loop []
  (when-not @stop
    (eval '(take* (fn foo [])))
    (Thread/sleep @sleep-duration)

(future (run-loop))

(reset! sleep-duration 0)

Again, the cache is in the take* method itself, using each new foo class as a key.

Workaround: A workaround is to run -reset-methods on the protocol before the PermGen space is all used up, e.g.

(-reset-methods ITake)

This works because -reset-methods replaces the cache with an empty MethodImplCache.

Patch: protocol_multifn_weak_ref_cache.diff

Screened by:

Comment by Chouser [ 30/Jan/13 9:10 AM ]

I think the most obvious solution would be to constrain the size of the cache. Adding an item to the cache is already not the fastest path, so a bit more work could be done to prevent the cache from growing indefinitely large.

That does raise the question of what criteria to use. Keep the first n entries? Keep the n most recently used (which would require bookkeeping in the fast cache-hit path)? Keep the n most recently added?

Comment by Jamie Stephens [ 18/Oct/13 9:35 AM ]

At a minimum, perhaps a switch to disable the caches – with obvious performance impact caveats.

Seems like expensive LRU logic is probably the way to go, but maybe don't have it kick in fully until some threshold is crossed.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 18/Oct/13 4:28 PM ]

A report seeing this in production from mailing list:

Comment by Adrian Medina [ 10/Dec/13 11:43 AM ]

So this is why we've been running into PermGen space exceptions! This is a fairly critical bug for us - I'm making extensive use of multimethods in our codebase and this exception will creep in at runtime randomly.

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 17/Apr/14 9:52 PM ]

it might be better to split this in to two issues, because at a very abstract level the two issues are the "same", but concretely they are distinct (protocols don't really share code paths with multimethods), keeping them together in one issue seems like a recipe for a large hard to read patch

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 26/Jul/14 5:49 PM ]

naive-lru-method-cache-for-multimethods.diff replaces the methodCache in multimethods with a very naive lru cache built on PersistentHashMap and PersistentQueue

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 28/Jul/14 7:09 PM ]

naive-lru-for-multimethods-and-protocols.diff creates a new class clojure.lang.LRUCache that provides an lru cache built using PHashMap and PQueue behind an IPMap interface.

changes MultiFn to use an LRUCache for its method cache.

changes expand-method-impl-cache to use an LRUCache for MethodImplCache's map case

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 30/Jul/14 3:10 PM ]

I suspect my patch naive-lru-for-multimethods-and-protocols.diff is just wrong, unless MethodImplCache really is being used as a cache we can't just toss out entries when it gets full.

looking at the deftype code again, it does look like MethidImplCache is being used as a cache, so maybe the patch is fine

if I am sure of anything it is that I am unsure so hopefully someone who is sure can chime in

Comment by Nicola Mometto [ 31/Jul/14 11:02 AM ]

I haven't looked at your patch, but I can confirm that the MethodImplCache in the protocol function is just being used as a cache

Comment by dennis zhuang [ 08/Aug/14 6:21 AM ]

I developed a new patch that convert the methodCache in MultiFn to use WeakReference for dispatch value,and clear the cache if necessary.

I've test it with the code in ticket,and it looks fine.The classes will be unloaded when perm gen is almost all used up.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 22/Aug/14 4:55 PM ]

I don't know which to evaluate here. Does multifn_weak_method_cache.diff supersede naive-lru-for-multimethods-and-protocols.diff or are these alternate approaches both under consideration?

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 22/Aug/14 8:26 PM ]

the most straight forward thing, I think, is to consider them as alternatives, I am not a huge fan of weakrefs, but of course not using weakrefs we have to pick some bounding size for the cache, and the cache has a strong reference that could prevent a gc, so there are trade offs. My reasons to stay away from weak refs in general are using them ties the behavior of whatever you are building to the behavior of the gc pretty strongly. that may be considered a matter of personal taste

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 29/Aug/14 4:31 PM ]

All patches dated Aug 8 2014 and earlier no longer applied cleanly to latest master after some commits were made to Clojure on Aug 29, 2014. They did apply cleanly before that day.

I have not checked how easy or difficult it might be to update the patches.

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 29/Aug/14 7:00 PM ]

I've updated naive-lru-for-multimethods-and-protocols.diff to apply to the current master

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 29/Aug/14 7:34 PM ]

Thanks, Kevin. While JIRA allows multiple attachments to a ticket with the same filename but different contents, that can be confusing for people looking for a particular patch, and for a program I have that evaluates patches for things like whether they apply and build cleanly. Would you mind removing the older one, or in some other way making all the names unique?

Comment by Kevin Downey [ 29/Aug/14 8:43 PM ]

I deleted all of my attachments accept for my latest and greatest

Comment by dennis zhuang [ 30/Aug/14 9:51 AM ]

I updated multifn_weak_method_cache2.diff patch too.

I think using weak reference cache is better,because we have to keep one cache per multifn.When you have many multi-functions, there will be many LRU caches in memory,and they will consume too much memory and CPU for evictions. You can't choose a proper threshold for LRU cache in every environment.
But i don't have any benchmark data to support my opinion.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 10/Sep/14 2:38 PM ]

I'm going to set the LRU cache patch aside. I don't think it's possible to find a "correct" size for it and it seems weird to me to extend APersistentMap to build such a thing anyways.

I think it makes more sense to follow the same strategy used for other caches (such as the Keyword cache) - a combination ConcurrentHashMap with WeakReferences and a ReferenceQueue for clean-up. I don't see any compelling reason not to take the same path as other internal caches.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 10/Sep/14 3:44 PM ]

Stepping back a little to think about the problem.... our requirements are:
1) cache map of dispatch value (could be any Object) to multimethod function (IFn)
2) do we want keys to be compared based on equality or identity? identity-based opens up more reference-based caching options and is fine for most common dispatch types (Class, Keyword), but reduces (often eliminates?) cache hits for all other types where values are likely to be equiv but not identical (vector of strings for example)
3) concurrent access to cache
4) cache cannot grow without bound
5) cache cannot retain strong references to dispatch values (the cache keys) because the keys might be instances of classes that were loaded in another classloader which will prevent GC in permgen

multifn_weak_method_cache.diff uses a ConcurrentHashMap (#3) that maps RefWrapper around keys to IFn (#1). The patch uses Util.equals() (#2) for (Java) equality-based comparisons. The RefWrapper wraps them in WeakReferences to avoid #5. Cache clearing based on the ReferenceQueue is used to prevent #4.

A few things definitely need to be fixed:

  • Util.equals() should be Util.equiv()
  • methodCache and rq should be final
  • Why does RefWrapper have obj and expect rq to possibly be null?
  • RefWrapper fields should all be final
  • Whitespace errors in patch

Another idea entirely - instead of caching dispatch value, cache based on hasheq of dispatch value then equality check on value. Could then use WeakHashMap and no RefWrapper.

This patch does not cover the protocol cache. Is that just waiting for the multimethod case to look good?

Comment by dennis zhuang [ 10/Sep/14 7:18 PM ]

Hi, alex, thanks for your review.But the latest patch is multifn_weak_method_cache2.diff. I will update the patch soon by your review, but i have a few questions to be explained.

1) I will use Util.equiv() instead of Util.equals().But what's the difference of them?
2) When the RefWrapper is retained as key in ConcurrentHashMap, it wraps the obj in WeakReference.But when trying to find it in ConcurrentHashMap, it uses obj directly as strong reference, and create it with passing null ReferenceQueue.Please look at the multifn_weak_method_cache2.diff line number 112. It short, the patch stores the dispatch value as weak reference in cache,but uses strong reference for cache getting.

3) If caching dispatch value based on hasheq , can we avoid hasheq value conflicts? If two different dispatch value have a same hasheq( or why it doesn't happen?), we would be in trouble.

Sorry, the patch doesn't cover the protocol cache, i will add it ASAP.

Comment by dennis zhuang [ 11/Sep/14 2:02 AM ]

The new patch 'protocol_multifn_weak_ref_cache.diff' is uploaded.

1) Using Util.equiv() instead of Util.equals()
2) Moved the RefWrapper and it's associated methods to Util.java, and refactor the code based on alex's review.
3) Fixed whitespace errors.
4) Fixed PermGen leak in protocol fns.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 03/Oct/14 10:35 AM ]

I screened this ticket again with Brenton Ashworth and had the following comments:

1) We need to have a performance test to verify that we have not negatively impacted performance of multimethods or protocol invocation.
2) Because there are special cases around null keys in the multimethod cache, please verify that there are existing example tests using null dispatch values in the existing test coverage.
3) In Util$RefWrapper.getObj() - why does this return this.ref at the end? It was not clear to me that the comment was correct or that this was useful in any way.
4) In Util$RefWrapper.clearRefWrapCache() - can k == null in that if check? If not, can we omit that? Also, if you explicitly create the Iterator from the entry set, you can call .remove() on it more efficiently than calling .remove() on the cache itself.
5) In core_deftype / MethodImplCache, it appears that you are modifying a now-mutable field rather than the prior version that was going to great lengths to stay immutable. It's not clear to me what the implications of this change are and that concerns me. Can it use a different collection or code to stay immutable?
6) Please update the description of this ticket to include an approach section that describes the changes we are making.


[CLJ-1125] Clojure can leak memory when used in a servlet container Created: 11/Dec/12  Updated: 11/Jan/14  Resolved: 11/Jan/14

Status: Closed
Project: Clojure
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: Release 1.6

Type: Defect Priority: Critical
Reporter: Toby Crawley Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Completed Votes: 14
Labels: memory

Attachments: File threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2012-12-11.diff     File threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-06-14.diff     File threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-11-24.diff    
Patch: Code
Approval: Ok


When used within a servlet container (Jetty/Tomcat/JBossAS/Immutant/etc), the thread locals Var.dvals (used to store dynamic bindings) and LockingTransaction.transaction (used to store the currently active transaction(s)) prevent all of the classes loaded by an application's clojure runtime from being garbage collected, resulting in a memory leak.

Cause: The issue comes from threads living beyond the lifetime of a deployment - servlet containers use thread pools that are shared across all applications within the container. Currently, the dvals and transaction thread locals are not discarded when they are no longer needed, causing their contents to retain a hard reference to their classloaders, which, in turn, causes all of the classes loaded under the application's classloader to be retained until the thread exits (which is generally at JVM shutdown).

Solution: I've attached a patch that does the following:

  • Var.dvals is initialized to a canonical TOP Frame
  • Var.dvals is now removed when the thread bindings are popped to the TOP
  • The outer transaction in LockingTransaction.transaction now removes the thread local when it is finished

There is still the opportunity for memory leaks if agents or futures are used, and the executors used for them are not shutdown when the app is undeployed. That's a solvable problem, but should probably be solved by the containers themselves (and/or the war generation tools) instead of in clojure itself.

This patch has a small performance impact: its use of a try/finally around running transactions to remove the outer transaction adds 4-6 microseconds to each transaction call on my hardware.

Providing an automated test for this patch is difficult - I've tested it locally with repeated deployments to a container while monitoring GC and permgen. All of clojure's tests pass with it applied.

The above is a condensation of:

Patch: threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-11-24.diff

Screened by: Alex Miller - the new patch (since prior screening) has no changes in the LockingTransaction code but has been updated in Var to address the regression logged in CLJ-1299.

Comment by Colin Jones [ 13/May/13 7:30 PM ]

This patch works great for me to avoid OOM/PermGen crashes from classloaders being retained [mine is a non-servlet use case].

Comment by Stuart Halloway [ 24/May/13 9:43 AM ]

Does Tomcat create warnings for Clojure, as described e.g. here?

If so, does this patch make the warnings go away?

Comment by Toby Crawley [ 24/May/13 9:56 AM ]

Stu: that's a good question. I'll take a look at Tomcat this afternoon.

Comment by Stuart Halloway [ 24/May/13 10:04 AM ]

The code that calls transaction.remove() seems unncessarily subtle. There are two exits from the method, and only one is protected by the finally block.

If the "outer" case was a top-level if, the logic would be more clear, and only the "outer" case would need try/finally, which might reduce the performance penalty in the case of deeply nested dosyncs.

Did your transaction overhead of 4-6 microseconds test only one level of dosync, or many?

Comment by Stuart Halloway [ 24/May/13 10:13 AM ]

Because the unwind code calls remove at the top (as opposed to set(null)), the code should now be safe for use with Clojure-defined ThreadLocal subclasses.

Therefore, Var's use of an initialValue should be irrelevant to this patch, and it should be possible to fix this bug with a patch half the size of the current patch, touching only LockingTransaction.runInTransaction and Var.popThreadBindings.

Comment by Toby Crawley [ 14/Jun/13 7:38 AM ]

re: Tomcat ThreadLocal warnings

With Clojure 1.5.1 using my test app (linked below), I see:

Jun 14, 2013 6:35:22 AM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader checkThreadLocalMapForLeaks
SEVERE: The web application [/leak] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [clojure.lang.Var$1] (value [clojure.lang.Var$1@4902919]) and a value of type [clojure.lang.Var.Frame] (value [clojure.lang.Var$Frame@147a2aa6]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.
Jun 14, 2013 6:35:22 AM org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader checkThreadLocalMapForLeaks
SEVERE: The web application [/leak] created a ThreadLocal with key of type [java.lang.ThreadLocal] (value [java.lang.ThreadLocal@608602ca]) and a value of type [clojure.lang.LockingTransaction] (value [clojure.lang.LockingTransaction@7e214d47]) but failed to remove it when the web application was stopped. Threads are going to be renewed over time to try and avoid a probable memory leak.

With the original patch (threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2012-12-11.diff) and the one attached today (threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-06-14.diff), I no longer see these warnings.

re: the LockingTransaction.runInTransaction changes

In today's patch (threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-06-14.diff), I modified runInTransaction to have one exit point, and only wrap a call to run with a try/finally in the outer transaction case. It does introduce two locations where run can be called to preserve the case where an inner transaction has null info:

static public Object runInTransaction(Callable fn) throws Exception{
	LockingTransaction t = transaction.get();
        Object ret;
	if(t == null) {
            transaction.set(t = new LockingTransaction());
            try {
                ret = t.run(fn);
            } finally {
        } else {
            if(t.info != null) {
                ret = fn.call();
            } else {
                ret = t.run(fn);

        return ret;

However, this will likely not reduce the speed penalty I observed in my testing, as I was only using a single level of dosync when capturing timing data.

re: removing initialValue from dvals

My original solution kept initialValue, but I then apparently discovered cases where the leak still occurred (see the mailing list thread).

Unfortunately, I can neither recreate that case, nor find in my notes, test code, or the clojure code a reason why keeping initialValue would allow the ThreadLocals to leak when popThreadBindings is patched (assuming one doesn't call Var.getThreadBindings from Java without calling Var.popThreadBindings).

Therefore, I've attached a simpler patch (threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-06-14.diff) that just patches LockingTransaction.runInTransaction and Var.popThreadBindings.

I've also created a project that demonstrates the leak with 1.5.1, and that the leak does not appear with this patch applied to 1.6.0-master. See its README for usage details.

The patched version of 1.6.0-master is available as [org.clojars.tcrawley/clojure "1.6.0-clearthreadlocals"] if anyone wants to give it a try in their own projects. Note that since its group isn't 'org.clojure', you may need to add exclusions to your project to prevent another version of clojure being included.

Comment by Andy Fingerhut [ 14/Jun/13 10:56 AM ]

Presumptuously changing ticket approval from Incomplete back to its former Vetted state, since Toby's comments and new patch seem to address the comments that led Stu to change it to Incomplete.

Comment by Toby Crawley [ 02/Aug/13 10:30 AM ]


Is there anything else you need from me for this to be applied?

Comment by Chas Emerick [ 04/Aug/13 5:52 PM ]

FWIW, using Toby's Clojure dep with Immutant has eliminated the out-of-permgen errors I used to occasionally get after N app redeployments.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 23/Aug/13 11:08 AM ]

I looked at the updated patch and it seems good to me. In the LockingTransaction.runinTransaction code the cases are driven by where t=null and t.info=null. Of those 4 cases, I believe the same call is being made in all but the case of t == null (where a new LockingTransaction is created) and t.info != null. However, I believe since a new txn is created and t.info should start as null, this case does not actually exist in practice.

Greatly appreciate Chas's experience feedback and all of Toby and Stu's work to make this change solid!

Marking screened.

Comment by Alex Miller [ 22/Nov/13 7:59 PM ]

Reverted in 1.6.0-alpha3 based on CLJ-1299 report.

Comment by Toby Crawley [ 24/Nov/13 5:22 PM ]

I just attached a new patch (threadlocal-removal-tcrawley-2013-11-24.diff) that achieves the same ThreadLocal removal as the previous patch, but addresses the issues with binding conveyance reported in CLJ-1299.

Generated at Fri Jan 19 02:16:23 CST 2018 using JIRA 4.4#649-r158309.